By: immaemayo

immaemayo — Tue, 06 Dec 2011 22:38:38 +0000

thanks me and just copied and pasted all your badminton rules

By: serene_silence

serene_silence — Thu, 30 Sep 2010 15:37:18 +0000

Olympic Badminton rules say that the birdie has to have exactly fourteen feathers. #sportsfacts

By: dwolfe56

dwolfe56 — Wed, 01 Sep 2010 22:34:09 +0000

I'm playing shoe-minton with my papi <3 its like badminton but we only ever seem to hit eachothers shoes lol dad keeps changing the rules

By: Anonymous

Anonymous — Mon, 30 Aug 2010 01:01:41 +0000

international dating agency chat community for christian singles[/url] badminton rules for singles carnival singles cruises

By: ladybug

ladybug — Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:07:13 +0000

Glad you enjoy playing badminton. Badminton rules!

By: Marcus Bales

Marcus Bales — Tue, 24 Aug 2010 14:04:52 +0000

notevenanargument said: “You’ve been shown a pattern, a meaning-constituted-and-in-dialectical-turn-meaning-making structure, of perceiving/thinking verbs in The Snow Man, a pattern which governs, as it were, the actual meanings that the poem could mean: a “rule arising from within” The Snow Man.”But they’re not unique to that one poem. You could use those rules to write any poem, and because they’re not unique to that one poem, they can’t be said to arise from that poem. They are external rules that the poet applies to language to create a poem. That’s different from your claim that the rules arise from the poem itself. And that’s even without wondering how a poem, as yet unwritten, could generate rules for a self not yet extant.notevenanargument said: “You’ve been shown two literary/linguistic rules that have a special character – a ‘poetic’ character – when they’re used in the heightened or distilled or clarifying or vivifying language of a poem.”But they’re not unique to that one poem. You could use those rules to write any poem, and because they’re not unique to that one poem, they can’t be said to arise from that poem. They are external rules that the poet applies to language to create a poem. That’s different from your claim that the rules arise from the poem itself. And that’s even without wondering how a poem, as yet unwritten, could generate rules for a self not yet extant.notevenanargument said: “’Returning the ball inside the lines on the other side of the net’ is a rule of tennis; it’s also a rule of badminton. Rules in two different games can be the same rule and yet different rules.”I suppose they could, if badminton used balls. But even allowing for that slip of the tongue, you’re proving my point for me: that the rules you are trying to show arising from the poem are, in fact, external rules that could apply to other poems, even other non-poem writing.notevenanargument said: “You’ve been shown the rule of lineation, a rule that obtains in the case, for example, of The Snow Man. You again claim (inclusively) that the lines in this poem are arbitrary, whimsical, capricious, or, now, irrelevant.”That’s right, I do – because when you read ‘The Snow Man’, either aloud or to yourself, you don’t pause at the end of all the lines – or if you do, you’re making a mockery of how the language works. Free verse necessarily allows the lines to end anywhere for no reason – that’s part of its claim to be ‘free’ – and it offers no rules at all about why to end this line here or that line there. You may offer that the poet’s judgment ends lines where they do, but that, again, is an external rule: the poet’s judgment. You’re not showing how the poem itself generates its own rules, which is your claim.

Comments on: 2009 badminton rules

By: immaemayo

By: serene_silence

By: dwolfe56

By: Anonymous

By: ladybug

By: Marcus Bales